DESIGN AND STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF A LARGE-DIAMETER BUTTERFLY VALVE USING ELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, IN
  • 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar , IN
  • 3Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, CZ
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IN
  • 5Department of Biosciences, Saveetha School of Engineering. Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IN
  • 6Petro Valves Private Limited, Ahmedabad, IN

Abstract

This study presents the design, structural analysis, and validation of a large-diameter butterfly valve in accordance with ASME and MSS standards. The valve body wall thickness was determined using ASME B16.34 Mandatory Appendix VI and MSS SP-67, with corrosion allowances included, resulting in an effective thickness of 21.58 mm. The flange body was designed following ASME B16.47 requirements, while empirical equations were applied for body neck dimensions to ensure load-carrying capacity. The disc was designed with an elliptical profile to minimize deformation, with a final thickness of 80–180 mm to withstand pressure loading. The stem and pin were dimensioned using torque-based design equations, resulting in a stem diameter of 100 mm. A detailed 3D CAD model was developed and meshed for finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate deformation and stress distribution. Maximum deformation of 3.54 mm occurred at the disc under a pressure of 2.94 MPa, while the body remained structurally stable due to sufficient thickness. Stress classification lines (SCL) were used to linearize equivalent stresses, with primary membrane and bending stresses evaluated against ASME Section VIII, Division 2 criteria. Results indicated that the valve design is safe up to 1.96 MPa, while operation at 2.94 MPa may lead to stress levels exceeding allowable limits. Overall, the proposed design demonstrates compliance with ASME code requirements under the recommended pressure range and provides a safe and efficient structural configuration for large butterfly valves.

Recommended articles

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE COMPENSATION IN MACHINING LATHE CHUCKS – PATENTS STATE OF ART

TOMASZ KOZIOR, JERZY BOCHNIA
Keywords: Lathe chucks | centrifugal force | patents

ANNULAR EROSION FOOTPRINT UNDER STATIC ULTRASONIC PULSATING WATER JET EXPOSURE

GABRIEL STOLARIK, JAKUB POLOPRUDSKY, SERGEJ HLOCH, AKASH NAG, ALICE CHLUPOVA
Keywords: pulsating water jet | Erosion pattern | Annular erosion footprint | morphology | scanning electron microscopy